NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Okay, everyone here knows I'm a big fan of South Dakota, but seriously, when the SoDak House legislature starts passing bills like this:
http://forum.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=messageboard.PostThread&groupID=100000182&adTopicID=25&Mytoken=F39B7E49-1527-D162-F63012912871468333041595
it gets hard to maintain respect for the powers that be in that state.
Under this bill, if a woman is raped she will be forced to have the baby, and the rapist will have just as many rights to the child as she herself does.
Think about that.
If you live in South Dakota, please contact your local legislator and tell them you think this bill is wrong. Point out the flaws and ask that the bill at least be re-written to a more suitable level of reality.
You can find out who your legislator is by visiting http://legis.state.sd.us/index.aspx
Please help in maintaining the legal right to choose.
posted by SpangledAngel @ 1:49 PM
1 Comments:
Dude... what the FUCK.
How about I forcibly insert an 8 lb pot roast into the rectum of everyone who approves of this bill.
After 9 months, they can remove the pot roast, but they have to put $1000 a month into the Pot Roast Fund for the next 18 years. They also have to give the pot roast its own bedroom, a wardrobe, and will need to make sure the pot roast is safe at all times. Also, the pot roast likes to be entertained and can be quite demanding at times, including the middle of the night. These are just a few of the joys of state-mandated pot roast ownership. Over time, they will come to love the pot roast.
Of course, I will have visitation rights, and may drag them into a custody battle over the pot roast, as I had the idea of inserting it into their rectum in the first place. (Wasn't that nice of me?) Sure, I might want to insert things into the pot roast itself, but what could go wrong with that plan?
Post a Comment
<< Home